Search results for "Monopolistic competition"

showing 10 items of 21 documents

Agglomeration without trade: how non-traded goods shape the space-economy

2004

Abstract We develop a spatial general equilibrium model in which the absence of interregional trade is an endogenous outcome. Extending the model developed by Ottaviano, Tabuchi, and Thisse (Int. Econ. Rev. 43 (2002) 409), we show that equilibria without trade differ significantly from those obtained in the presence of trade, which suggests that the presence of non-traded goods has a significant impact on spatial structures. Somewhat surprisingly, equilibrium structures without trade are richer than those with trade because partial agglomeration becomes a feasible outcome. Equilibria now depend on the ratio of mobile to immobile factors and an increase in that ratio triggers a process of sp…

Urban StudiesMicroeconomicsEconomics and EconometricsMonopolistic competitionGeneral equilibrium theoryEconomies of agglomerationEconomicsSpace (commercial competition)Outcome (game theory)Journal of Urban Economics
researchProduct

R&D, Competition and Growth with Human Capital Accumulation Revisited

2012

In this paper, we have presented a generalization of Bucci's (2003) model in which have disentangled the monopolistic mark-up in the intermediate goods sector, the intermediate goods share in the final output and the returns to specialization in order to have a better measurement of competition. Indeed, unlike Bucci (2003), in our model, the measure of competition is completely independent of the intermediate goods share in the final output and the returns to specialization. Our main finding is that, unlike Bucci (2003), we show that the competition does not play any role in growth. This result is explained by the complementarity of innovation and human capital assumed in the research produ…

Statistics and ProbabilityEconomics and EconometricsJ24O41technological changejel:D43Endogenous growth; horizontal differentiation; technological change; imperfect competition; human capitalHuman capitaljel:J24MicroeconomicsCompetition (economics)jel:O41Monopolistic competitionhorizontal differentiationSpecialization (functional)ddc:330Per capitaEconomicsProduction (economics)[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesimperfect competitionhuman capital[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSO31Endogenous growth theory[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceL16Endogenous growthjel:O31jel:L16HUMAN CAPITALImperfect competitionD43
researchProduct

Is the French mobile phone cartel really a cartel?

2009

International audience; France Telecom (FT), SFR and Bouygues Telecom (BT) have been fined by France's Conseil de la Concurrence (CC) for organizing a mobile phone cartel with stable market shares (one-half, one-third and one-sixth, respectively) and for directly exchanging commercial information. While not contesting the legal decision, it is argued here that the economic reasoning is flawed. (1) As the CC made much of the firms' stable market shares, we have first followed this line of reasoning by considering that the market shares are quotas under uniform costs. Even if there is a general incentive to form a monopolistic cartel, BT was too small for it to be worth its while to join it; it i…

JEL : K - Law and Economics/K.K2 - Regulation and Business Law/K.K2.K21 - Antitrust LawEconomics and EconometricsCournotJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsStackelbergMobile telephonyCartelJEL L13 L41 L96 D43 K21Management Science and Operations ResearchCournot competitionIndustrial and Manufacturing EngineeringMicroeconomicsCompetition (economics)Monopolistic competitionJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsEconomicsStackelberg competition[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesMarket shareGSMARCEPJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionCartel[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGeneral Business Management and AccountingJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionJEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K2 - Regulation and Business Law/K.K2.K21 - Antitrust LawJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesConseil de la ConcurrenceIncentiveMonopolyMobile phoneJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesInternational Journal of Production Economics
researchProduct

On Capturing Oil Rents with a National Excise Tax Revisited

2004

In this paper the scope of Bergstrom’s (1982) results is studied. Moreover, his analysis is extended assuming that extraction cost is directly related to accumulated extractions. For the case of a competitive market it is found that the optimal policy is a constant tariff if extraction is costless. However, with depletion effects, the optimal tariff must ultimately be decreasing. For the case of a monopolistic market the results depend crucially on the kind of strategies the importing country governments can play and on whether the monopolist chooses the price or extraction rate. For a price-setting monopolist it is shown that the importing countries cannot use a tariff to capture monopoly …

jel:D41media_common.quotation_subjectEconomic rentjel:C73Tariffjel:D42Tariffs Tariff agreements Non renewable resources Depletion effects Price-setting monopolist Quantity-setting monopolist Differential games Open-loop strategies Linear strategies Markov-perfect Nash equilibrium Markov-perfect Stackelberg equilibriumjel:F02jel:H20MicroeconomicsMonopolistic competitionResource (project management)EconomicsPerfect competitionExciseMonopolyNon-renewable resourcejel:Q38media_commonSSRN Electronic Journal
researchProduct

The Institutionalists’ Reaction to Chamberlin’s 'Theory of Monopolistic Competition

2009

Edwin Chamberlin's The Theory of Monopolistic competition is often described as containing omportant traces of institutionalist influence. This is also confimred by Chamberlin himself who, repeadetly, referred to the work of Veblen, and John Maurice Clark among his inspirational sources. The aim of this paper is to analyse the institutionalist rection to the publication of the Theory of Monopolistic Competition. What will be argued is that the institutionalist response to Chamberlin was a mixed one, and involved some substantial criticisms of his analysis of market structures both on methodological and theoretical grounds. The paper is organized as follows. The first section presents a sket…

INSTITUTIONALISM MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITIONjel:B25
researchProduct

Unemployment, taxation and public expenditure in OECD economies

2008

Abstract This paper considers the financing of productive public goods and social benefits through different types of taxes in a model with unemployment. We incorporate unemployment, caused by the wage-setting behaviour of a monopolistic union, in a neoclassical growth model which integrates a quite detailed structure of taxes used to finance productive public expenditures and social transfers and parameterizes the inefficiency of government to transform taxes into public goods or transfers. The main conclusion is that the relationship between unemployment and labour taxes critically depends on the degree of government efficiency and the unions' perception on how taxes determine the welfare…

Economics and EconometricsLabour economicsTax deferralmedia_common.quotation_subjectPublic expenditureWelfare statePublic goodMonopolistic competitionPolitical Science and International RelationsUnemploymentEconomicsInefficiencyEmpirical evidencemedia_commonEuropean Journal of Political Economy
researchProduct

Monopolistic competition and different wage setting systems

2010

In this paper, we present a disequilibrium unemployment model without labor market frictions and monopolistic competition in the goods market within an infinite horizon model of growth. We consider different wage setting systems and compare wages, the unemployment rate, and income per capita in the long-run at firm, sector, and national (centralized) levels. The aim of this paper is to determine under which conditions, the inverted-U hypothesis between unemployment and the degree of centralization of wage bargaining, reported by Calmfors and Driffill [Economic Policy, 6, 14¿61, 1988], is confirmed. Our analysis shows that a high degree of market power normally produces the inverted-U shape …

Economics and EconometricsLabour economicsSociology and Political ScienceDisequilibrium Unemploymentmedia_common.quotation_subjectDisequilibriumWageSocial WelfareGrowthPer capita incomeEconomiajel:E24jel:O41Monopolistic competitionDisequilibrium Unemployment Monopolistic Competition Growth Wage Setting Systems.Efficiency wageUnemploymentWage Setting SystemsEconomicsmedicineMonopolistic CompetitionMarket powermedicine.symptommedia_common
researchProduct

An appraisal of Piero Sraffa's 'The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions'

2001

The paper proposes a new interpretation of Sraffa's 1926 Economic Journal article, ‘The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions’, according to which the latter derives from the same strategy of research which underlies its 1925 Italian precursor, ‘Sulle relazioni fra costo e quantità prodotta’. Sraffa tested the explanatory power of a Marshallian monopolistic partial equilibrium model and concluded that that model is able to treat one source of variable returns (firm-internal economies); but this articulation of Marshall‘s theory does not substantially improve on the trade-off between logical consistency and empirical relevance which afflicted the theory in its whole. © 2001, Taylor & …

MarshallSraffaGeneral Arts and HumanitiesInterpretation (philosophy)Partial equilibriumEconomics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)Logical consistencyPerfect competitionVariable (computer science)Monopolistic competitionHistory and Philosophy of ScienceSettore SECS-P/04 - Storia Del Pensiero EconomicoLawEconomicsRelevance (law)Explanatory powerMonopolyArticulation (sociology)Mathematical economicsThe European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
researchProduct

Quality pricing-to-market

2014

We examine firm's pricing-to-market decisions in vertically differentiated industries featuring a large number of firms that compete monopolistically in the quality space. Firms sell goods of heterogeneous quality to consumers with non-homothetic preferences that differ in their income and thus their marginal willingness to pay for quality increments. We derive closed-form solutions for the pricing game under costly international trade, thus establishing existence and uniqueness. We then examine how the interaction of good quality and market demand for quality affects firms' pricing-to-market decisions. The relative price of high quality goods compared to that of low quality goods is an inc…

Economics and Econometricsmedia_common.quotation_subjectjel:E41Product differentiationProduct differentiationMonopolistic competitionExchange rateExchange rate pass-through0502 economics and businessEconomicsPrice levels ; International tradejel:E3Pricing-to-marketQuality (business)Market power050207 economicsIndustrial organization050205 econometrics media_commonbiology05 social sciencesExchange-rate pass-throughCompetitor analysisbiology.organism_classification[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceMussaQualityjel:F12jel:L13jel:F4exchange rate pass-through; intra-industry trade; monopolistic competition; pricing-to-market; vertical differentiationFinance
researchProduct

A reconsideration of the link between vertical externality and managerial incentives

2018

Previous research revealed that the strategic role of delegation contracts disappears if two quantity†setting firms outsource input production to a monopolistic supplier. I show that this role is restored if the assumption of a downstream duopoly is relaxed. Thus, delegation contracts allow downstream profit†maximizing owners to commit their firms to a behavior that differs from their preferences. This behavior varies nonmonotonically with the number of firms in the downstream market. Corresponding deviations from profit maximization are larger if the upstream monopolist makes a price precommitment. But little to no deviation occurs if the number of firms is large.

Upstream (petroleum industry)050208 financeDelegationStrategy and ManagementProfit maximizationmedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesManagement Science and Operations ResearchMicroeconomicsMonopolistic competitionDownstream (manufacturing)Management of Technology and Innovation0502 economics and businessEconomicsPrecommitment050207 economicsBusiness and International ManagementDuopolyExternalitymedia_commonManagerial and Decision Economics
researchProduct